More SNG follies

Makes no sense to me why people are blind with aggression when a much smaller bet can tell you the same thing -- whether you are beat or not. Thanks to his contribution, I went on to win this one.

PokerStars Game #6407435669: Tournament #32517022, $30+$3 Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2006/09/24 - 19:59:17 (ET)
Table '32517022 1' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 3: AAESAA (5770 in chips)
Seat 4: alishik (2360 in chips)
Seat 5: kurokitty (5370 in chips)
alishik: posts small blind 75
kurokitty: posts big blind 150
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kurokitty [2s 2d]
AAESAA: raises 150 to 300
alishik: folds
kurokitty: calls 150 (I thought about raising here but just decided to see the flop)
*** FLOP *** [2c Ts Kd]
kurokitty: checks
AAESAA: bets 900
kurokitty: raises 900 to 1800
AAESAA: raises 3670 to 5470 and is all-in
kurokitty: calls 3270 and is all-in
*** TURN *** [2c Ts Kd] [8d]
*** RIVER *** [2c Ts Kd 8d] [9d]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
kurokitty: shows [2s 2d] (three of a kind, Deuces)
AAESAA: shows [Kc 8c] (two pair, Kings and Eights)
kurokitty collected 10815 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 10815 | Rake 0
Board [2c Ts Kd 8d 9d]
Seat 3: AAESAA (button) showed [Kc 8c] and lost with two pair, Kings and Eights
Seat 4: alishik (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: kurokitty (big blind) showed [2s 2d] and won (10815) with three of a kind, Deuces